Table 3: Comparison of sulfur content in actual soil samples by combustion method and HS XRF
Sample No |
20N3100003 |
20N3100006 |
20N3100015 |
20N3100016 |
20N2620009 |
20N2620023 |
20N2620031 |
20N2620038 |
20N2620040 |
20N2620042 |
20N2620047 |
Combustion method test value |
0.26% |
0.88% |
0.25% |
0.66% |
0.17% |
0.16% |
0.13% |
0.12% |
0.11% |
0.18% |
0.13% |
HS XRF test value |
0.27% |
0.92% |
0.27% |
0.65% |
0.17% |
0.16% |
0.12% |
0.11% |
0.12% |
0.19% |
0.13% |
Relative deviation |
1.31% |
2.22% |
3.29% |
-0.53% |
1.46% |
0 |
-1.59% |
-3.93% |
2.18% |
0.54% |
0.39% |
Sample handling
Features and advantages
Stability
Stable analysis data can be obtained within 1 hour of startup, and it have excellent repeatability in continuous testing, day testing and long-term testing.
Accuracy
FP 2.0 eliminates the analysis error caused by the difference of sample matrix and spectral line interference through theoretical calculation, only a few standard (fixed value) samples are used to obtain accurate quantitative results.
Low consumption
There is need to consume gas, liquid nitrogen refrigeration, vacuum, etc., to achieve long-term operation with low failure rate.
fast
The nutrient content analysis of a soil sample can be completed in as little as 60 seconds.
Extend
Scalable analysis of Na-Zn element content in various samples.
Original statement:
This article is the original work of ancoren company except for the quotation. If it is forwarded and quoted, the source must be indicated, otherwise it may involve infringement. For more detailed technical information, please consult the staff of Ancoren.